Blue Skies 4 Arizona

Together, We Can Bring Back Clear Blue Skies

Educating, unifying and taking action against solar radiation management (SRM) and stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), often referred to as “chemtrails.”

This is a test. test

Why This Matters

Every day, more citizens are noticing something isn’t right with our skies.

Once known for its bright, sunny days, Arizona is now increasingly blanketed by unnatural cloud cover—lines and haze left behind by jets, spreading until the sun disappears behind a murky veil. No agency claims responsibility. No clear answers are given. But the effects are impossible to ignore.

Blue Skies 4 All was founded by ordinary people—athletes, parents, professionals—who decided enough is enough. We’re here to educate, unite, and take action against the unregulated and unacknowledged practice of solar radiation management (SRM) and stratospheric aerosol injections (SAIs), often referred to as “chemtrails.”

What began as quiet concern has grown into a movement. One of our founders, a longtime triathlete, recalls how the skies used to be—clear, predictable, alive. But during Thanksgiving week of 2024, the transformation became undeniable: skies would start off clear, then become crosshatched by aircraft trails until the sun was dimmed by a gray canopy.

“I felt like a bug being exterminated. That’s when I realized—I am the ‘they’ I’d been waiting for.”

From that moment on, we’ve worked tirelessly with local representatives, pushed for legislation, and built a network of informed, committed citizens. Though our first bill failed, our resolve has only grown stronger.

HB2056: The First Breakthrough in Arizona’s

Fight Against Geoengineering

Every big movement starts with a first step, and for Arizona, that step was House Bill 2056.

HB2056 clears its first hurdle in House Oversight

First hearing of HB2056, Rep. Lisa Fink’s geoengineering prohibition bill, which

passed House Regulatory Oversight on 1/28/25.

HB2056 was the spark. It showed what’s possible when representatives and citizens push together for transparency, accountability, and the right to have a say in what happens in our skies.

Sponsored by Representative Lisa Fink, HB2056 was the state’s first attempt to put a stop to geoengineering practices like cloud seeding and solar radiation management (SRM). For many Arizonans, this bill represented something powerful: their concerns finally being voiced at the Capitol.

On January 28, 2025, that voice was heard.

HB2056 went before the House Regulatory Oversight Committee — and it passed.

That moment mattered. In a legislative system where so many bills are killed before they ever see daylight, HB2056 broke through the silence. It proved that the issue of geoengineering wasn’t too fringe, too complicated, or too controversial to move forward. It proved lawmakers were willing to listen.

From there, the bill was also assigned to the House Natural Resources Committee, where it unfortunately stalled. But let’s not overlook the victory: HB2056 became the first geoengineering prohibition bill in Arizona history to advance out of a House committee.

SB1432: A Landmark Step

Toward Accountability in Arizona’s Skies

For those who doubt whether citizen voices can make a difference, look no further than Senate Bill SB1432.

SB1432 Advances Senate Natural ResourCES Committee

SB1432 SRM prohibition bill passed Senate Natural Resources Committee

Supporters should take heart. SB1432 was not a defeat — it was a breakthrough. And breakthroughs don’t just disappear. They create the foundation for the next fight, the next session, and the next victory.

SB1432 showed us what’s possible. Now it’s up to all of us to make sure the next bill doesn’t just pass the Senate — but becomes law.

Introduced by Senator David Farnsworth, SB1432 set out to prohibit geoengineering practices in Arizona, including controversial solar radiation management (SRM). This wasn’t just a symbolic effort. The bill had substance, clarity, and the backing of Arizonans who believe the public deserves a say in environmental decisions that directly affect their health and skies.

On February 18, 2025, SB1432 received its first hearing before the Senate Natural Resources Committee.
The bill didn’t just get heard. It passed.
From there, it advanced to the Senate floor, where legislators once again gave their approval.
The Senate passed SB1432.
On 03/18/2025, SB1432 was passed by the House Regulatory Oversight Committee

This was the furthest any geoengineering prohibition bill has advanced in Arizona to date.

SB1432 was ultimately stalled when it reached the House Natural Resources Committee, where no hearing was scheduled. But that doesn’t erase its achievement. If anything, it proves that real momentum is building. A geoengineering ban bill didn’t just survive committee; it earned the support of the full Senate.

That matters. And it tells us that:

The issue is being taken seriously.
Lawmakers are listening.
And with continued grassroots involvement, Arizona is closer than ever to enacting real protections.

But progress stopped cold when both bills were denied hearings in the House Natural Resources Energy & Water Committee. Supportive voices were drowned out not by opposition, but by one chair’s refusal to let the bills move forward.

Why Do Good Bills Die Silently?

Arizona just witnessed a troubling reminder of how our legislative process can be undermined—not with loud debate, but with quiet inaction.

How? By refusing to schedule a hearing. No debate. No vote. No voice for the public. Just silence.

Two bills, HB2056 (sponsored by Rep. Lisa Fink) and SB1432 (sponsored by Sen. David Farnsworth), sought to prohibit geoengineering practices like cloud seeding and solar radiation management. These bills weren’t extreme. They reflected the concerns of thousands of Arizonans who want transparency and consent before powerful actors manipulate the skies above us.

This is how good-faith legislation gets buried in what many now call the “committee graveyard.” A place where bills don’t die because they’re unpopular or poorly written—they die because a single chair decides they’ll never see the light of day.

And yet, despite one bill passing the Arizona Senate, both were quietly stopped in their tracks by one person: Representative Gail Griffin, Chair of the House Natural Resources Energy & Water Committee.

Grassroots supporters called. They emailed. They showed up at the Capitol. But the calendar stayed blank. Their voices never even reached the floor.

We are left asking: Who really holds the power in Arizona? Elected representatives, or committee chairs who act as gatekeepers of democracy?

Arizona deserves better. We deserve open hearings, honest debate, and a process that respects the people’s will—not one that silences it.

We Need Leaders Who Will Fight to Protect Our Skies

Leaders like Fink and Farnsworth give us reason for hope. They remind us what public service should look like: listening, representing, and standing up for their constituents, even when it’s politically uncomfortable.

While some Arizona leaders chose silence, Representative Lisa Fink and Senator David Farnsworth didn’t shy away from the hard fight — they introduced the first bills in Arizona to directly confront geoengineering practices.

Arizona needs more lawmakers willing to follow their example. Because at the end of the day, our skies belong to all of us — not to the few who hold a committee calendar.

HB2056, sponsored by Rep. Fink, sought to ban atmospheric interventions like cloud seeding and solar radiation management.
SB1432, sponsored by Sen. Farnsworth, sharpened the language to make sure “releasing” and “dispensing” chemicals into the atmosphere couldn’t be ignored or excused.

Together, these bills reflected a simple but powerful idea: the people of Arizona deserve a say in what happens in our skies.

And they gained traction. Farnsworth’s version passed the Senate. Fink’s bill passed House Regulatory Oversight. Each step forward showed that this wasn’t some fringe issue — it was a serious concern backed by lawmakers willing to listen.

Federal and State Efforts Target Climate Manipulation

Efforts to regulate weather modification have surfaced at both state and federal levels. Earlier this month, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) announced plans to introduce a bill that would make it illegal to release or inject substances into the atmosphere with the intent of changing weather, climate, temperature, or sunlight levels.

🚨 BREAKING: CLEAR SKIES ACT INTRODUCED ☀️ I just introduced the Clear Skies Act to BAN geoengineering and weather modification. No more spraying chemicals in our skies. It’s time to end this dangerous and unregulated practice.
Posted by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene on Tuesday, July 15, 2025

“I’m glad weather modification and geoengineering are finally getting the attention and transparency they deserve, and I’m greatly appreciative to the Trump administration for it.”

- Marjorie Taylor Greene

“This will be a felony offense,” Greene stated, explaining that the proposed legislation mirrors a similar law already enacted in Florida. “I’ve been researching weather modification and working with legislative counsel for months writing this bill.”

In a separate discussion last August, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded to a viral video that showed what some believed to be atmospheric spraying. Kennedy described it as a “crime” he intended to “stop.”

During a town hall event on April 29, hosted by Dr. Phil McGraw, Kennedy also mentioned concerns involving the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). He suggested that materials such as bromium, aluminum, and strontium might be present in jet fuel, saying, “A lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel… I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it.”

Meanwhile, environmental concerns have also been raised within federal agencies. In a public statement, EPA official Lee Zeldin noted, “EPA shares many of the same concerns when it comes to potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities.” He added, “Prior to now, EPA has never been this proactive to raise awareness about concerns with geoengineering and to stop this activity from being scaled up.”

The Sting of Climate Intervention

Over the past eight months, U.S. beekeepers have experienced catastrophic losses—some reporting over 60% of their honeybee colonies gone. That’s millions of pollinators vanished, marking one of the worst seasons on record.

A Silent Collapse:
Where Are the Bees?

As climate intervention strategies grow more aggressive, experts caution that disrupting one system can unbalance another. The bee crisis may be more than just a warning—it might be a symptom of unintended consequences.

While pesticides, parasites, and habitat loss are well-known contributors, scientists are also investigating broader environmental stressors—including the potential side effects of geoengineering.

Geoengineering, such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), is designed to cool the planet by dispersing reflective particles like aluminum, barium, or sulfur into the atmosphere. But these particles may settle into soil and water, potentially affecting plant health and pollinator behavior

From the Frying Pan Into the Fire

In a compelling episode of Back to the People, lead researcher and founder of GeoengineeringWatch.org, Dane Wigington joins Nicole Shanahan to share his journey from sustainable living advocate to whistleblower on covert climate engineering practices.

Back to the People Podcast

By manipulating Earth’s climate via scattering particles to block sunlight or sucking carbon from the air, it gambles with nature’s delicate balance, inviting consequences we can’t possibly predict.

After observing a significant drop in his solar panels' efficiency and discovering toxic levels of aluminum in rainwater, Wigington began investigating the potential link to solar radiation management (SRM) programs. He argues that these initiatives, intended to mitigate climate change by reflecting sunlight, may be causing unintended environmental harm, including soil degradation and forest decline.

Wigington warns that such geoengineering efforts could be exacerbating the very issues they aim to solve, pushing us "from the frying pan into the fire."